高级检索

    化学吸收法和钙循环对中型燃气电厂进行CO2捕集的对比

    Comparison study of CO2 capture of NGCC plant by calcium looping and amine-scrubbing

    • 摘要: 对燃气电厂进行二氧化碳捕集与封存是迈向净零排放的必经之路。通过Aspen Plus建模对比研究化学吸收法和钙循环耦合燃气电厂进行CO2捕集。首先对燃气电厂进行建模,对比现有燃气电厂验证了模型准确性。再对化学吸收法和钙循环对此燃气电厂全厂CO2捕集进行建模分析。化学吸收法建模考虑了典型的MEA/MDEA(乙醇胺/甲基二乙醇胺)混合溶液作为吸收剂。钙循环燃气电厂CO2捕集考虑碳酸化炉在580 ℃运行,其理论CO2捕集率可以达到90%以上。钙循环存在高温烟气,燃气电厂的蒸汽循环可以将参数合理地提高到16.8 MPa/610 ℃/630 ℃。采用化学吸收法进行CO2捕集时,电厂净效率损失为7.3%,而钙循环CO2捕集下电厂净效率损失为4.9%,考虑通过颗粒换热器进行热量回收时,电厂净效率损失可进一步降低为3.4%。结果表明,钙循环可做为燃气电厂CO2捕集的一个合理的选项。

       

      Abstract: CO2 capture and storage from NGCC plant is the inevitable path towards net-zero emission. A modeling and comparison study of CO₂ capture in a NGCC plant by amine-scrubbing, calcium looping and via Aspen Plus is presented. First, the natural gas combined cycle plant (NGCC) was modeled and validated against existing plants. Subsequent modeling and analysis were conducted on CO2 capture for the NGCC plant using both calcium looping and amine-scrubbing. The amine-scrubbing considered a typical MEA/MDEA (monoethanolamine/methyldiethanolamine) blended solution as the absorbent. For the calcium looping process, the carbonator was considered operating at 580 ℃, with a theoretical CO2 capture rate of over 90%. The high-temperature flue gas in the calcium looping process allowed the steam cycle of the NGCC to be reasonably elevated to 16.8 MPa/610 ℃/630 ℃. When the amine-scrubbing is used for CO2 capture, the net efficiency loss of electricity generation of the NGCC is 7.3%, while it is 4.9% with calcium looping CO2 capture. By considering heat recovery through a granular heat exchanger, the net efficiency loss could be further reduced to 3.4%. It is demonstrated that calcium looping is a reasonable option for CO₂ capture in NGCC plants.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回