高级检索

    核电厂放射性14CO2分离与固化技术研究进展

    Research progress of radioactive 14CO2 separation and solidification technology in nuclear power plants

    • 摘要: 随着全球对清洁能源需求增长,核电在能源结构中占比逐渐提高,但其运行产生的放射性14C排放引发关注。14C半衰期长,参与全球碳循环,危害人体健康,降低其排放对核电安全环保发展意义重大。简要介绍核电厂中放射性14C 的产生途径及存在形态,从吸附法、吸收法和膜分离法3个方面阐述了工业 CO2捕集技术,并分析了各方法的原理、优缺点及研究进展,为核电厂14CO2捕集提供借鉴作用。在工业源CO2捕集技术中,吸收法通常具有更高的吸收效率和相对较低的成本,更适宜大规模工业化运用。但其仍面临溶剂性能、能耗和设备成本等方面的挑战。随后主要从干式CO2吸附技术、湿式CO2吸收技术和其他分离技术3个方面着重介绍了现有核电厂放射性14CO2分离与固化工艺,对比了不同工艺的参数及性能。虽然这几种技术都可以达到CO2的分离和固定,但不同的技术也存在自身的短板。吸附法具有高效、稳定的特点,但物理吸附受杂质气体影响,受限于吸附能力和成本问题,化学吸附则面临吸附速率和稳定性挑战。吸收法则拥有更高的去污因子和吸收效率,然而其吸收效率受工艺条件的影响较大,需准确控制各项工艺参数,才能对CO2进行有效分离。最后对核电厂14CO2分离技术未来的研究思路进行了探讨,对核电厂放射性14CO2的高效分离与固化,核电的清洁、安全、可持续发展提供助力。

       

      Abstract: The proportion of nuclear power in the global energy system is gradually increasing as the demand for clean energy grows. However, the radioactive 14C emissions generated during its operation have raised significant concerns. With a long half-life, 14C participates in the global carbon cycle and poses risks to human health. Therefore, reducing its emissions is of great importance for the development of nuclear power safety and environmental protection. The generation pathways and forms of radioactive 14C in nuclear power plants are briefly introduced. Industrial CO2 capture technologies are elaborated on from three perspectives: adsorption, absorption, and membrane separation methods. The principles, advantages, disadvantages, and research progress of each method are analyzed to provide a reference for 14CO2 capture in nuclear power plants.Among industrial CO2 capture technologies, the absorption method typically offers higher absorption efficiency and relatively lower costs, making it more suitable for large-scale industrial applications. However, it still faces challenges related to solvent performance, energy consumption, and equipment costs. The study then focuses on the separation and solidification processes of radioactive 14CO2 in nuclear power plants, covering dry CO2 adsorption technology, wet CO2 absorption technology, and other separation methods. The parameters and performance of different processes are compared. While these technologies can achieve CO2 separation and fixation, each has its limitations. The adsorption method is characterized by high efficiency and stability, but physical adsorption is affected by impurity gases, limited by adsorption capacity and cost, while chemical adsorption faces challenges in adsorption rate and stability. The absorption method offers a higher decontamination factor and absorption efficiency, but its performance is significantly influenced by process conditions, requiring precise control of parameters to effectively separate CO2. Finally, the study discusses future research directions for 14CO2 separation technology in nuclear power plants. This provides valuable insights for the efficient separation and solidification of radioactive 14CO2, contributing to the clean, safe, and sustainable development of nuclear power.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回