高级检索

    光伏光热(PV/T)热泵耦合填充床潜热储能供暖优化

    Optimization of heating system integrating PV/T heat pump and packed-ced latent heat storage

    • 摘要: 热泵与填充床潜热储能(PBTES)系统耦合可有效缓解热能供需时空错配,但现有研究对“光热–热泵–储能”耦合系统的动态特性及协同优化关注不足。因此,构建了3种供暖系统,即空气源热泵(ASHP)直接供暖、ASHP耦合PBTES供暖,以及ASHP、光伏光热(PV/T)热泵与PBTES结合的复合供暖系统。以西安市典型冬季日为计算工况,建立了PBTES循环蓄热传热模型及耦合暖气片的瞬态动态放热仿真程序,提出了基于动态递增流量控制的放热优化策略,并对3种系统的热力学性能与运行经济性进行了系统对比。结果表明:在ASHP恒定加热功率20 kW、循环流量8 m3/h条件下,PBTES系统可在8 h谷电时段内完成蓄热,蓄热量为101.65 MJ,储㶲量为54.00 MJ;储㶲功率在PCM相变阶段达到峰值约3.0 kW。在放热优化方面,抛物线递增流量策略使有效放热时长延长至2.54 h,较恒定流量基准方案提升172.5%。在系统性能对比方面,“ASHP+PV/T热泵+PBTES”复合系统综合性能最优,系统能效COP达3.73,日运行费用为92.58元,相较于ASHP直接供暖系统COP提升41.83%、运行费用降低41.53%,相较于“ASHP+PBTES”系统COP提升37.64%、运行费用降低37.04%。进一步的典型阴天工况补充分析表明,3种系统的性能排序结论具有工况稳健性。相关成果为“光热–热泵–相变储能”多能协同供热系统的工程化设计与运行优化提供了理论依据与参考。

       

      Abstract: The coupling of heat pumps with packed bed latent heat thermal energy storage (PBTES) systems offers an effective solution to mitigate the spatiotemporal mismatch between heat supply and demand. However, existing research remains insufficient regarding the dynamic thermodynamic characteristics and coordinated optimization of integrated photovoltaic/thermal (PV/T)-heat pump-PBTES systems. Three heating system configurations were developed and compared: An air-source heat pump (ASHP) direct heating system, an ASHP coupled with PBTES heating system, and a composite heating system integrating an ASHP, a PV/T heat pump, and a PBTES unit. Using a representative severe winter day in Xi'an as the calculation condition, a cyclic heat storage model and a transient heat release simulation program dynamically coupled with a hydronic radiator were established for the PBTES system. A dynamic flow control optimization strategy for the heat release process was proposed, and the thermodynamic performance and operational economics of the three systems were systematically compared. The results indicate that under a constant ASHP heating power of 20 kW and a flow rate of 8 m3/h, the PBTES system completes heat storage within the 8 h valley electricity period, achieving a total heat storage capacity of 101.65 MJ and an exergy storage capacity of 54.00 MJ, with the exergy storage power peaking at approximately 3.0 kW during the PCM phase change stage. Regarding heat release optimization, the parabolic increasing flow strategy extends the effective heat release duration to 2.54 h, representing a 172.5% improvement over the constant flow baseline. In terms of system performance comparison, the ASHP+PV/T heat pump+PBTES composite system achieves the best overall performance, with a system COP(Coefficient of Performance) of 3.73 and a daily operational cost of 92.58 CNY, representing a 41.83% improvement in COP and a 41.53% reduction in operational cost compared to the ASHP direct heating system, and a 37.64% improvement in COP and a 37.04% reduction in cost compared to the ASHP+PBTES system. Additional analyses conducted under typical cloudy conditions demonstrate that the performance rankings of the three systems remain consistent across different operating conditions. This study provides a theoretical basis and practical reference for the engineering design and operational optimization of solar thermal-heat pump-phase change storage integrated heating systems.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回