高级检索

    焦炉煤气制氢低碳路径甄选:三条主流工艺LCA与减排潜力分析

    Selection of Low-Carbon Pathways for Hydrogen Production from Coke Oven Gas: LCA and Emission Reduction Potential Analysis of Three Mainstream Processes

    • 摘要: 厘清不同焦炉煤气制氢技术的的碳排放与能效特征,对区域氢能低碳路径规划与焦化产业绿色转型具有重要意义。采用全生命周期评价方法(Life Cycle Assessment, LCA),对焦炉煤气直接制氢(路线A)、焦炉煤气蒸汽催化转化制氢(路线B)和焦炉煤气深冷分离联产制氢(路线C)三条主流技术路线进行量化评估与横向比对,重点分析了碳排放、能源消耗、能源效率及氢气回收率四项核心指标,开展了不确定性及敏感性分析,并优选了工艺路径。结果表明:(1)碳排放方面,路线C碳排放最低为5.09kgCO2/kgH2,路线B最高为15.46kgCO2/kgH2,路线A居中为13.59kgCO2/kgH2;(2)能效与氢气回收率方面,路线C总能效最高为86.01%,路线B可实现氢增量产出,氢气回收率达161.19%,路线A两项指标均为三者最低;(3)工艺优化方面,路线A最大碳减排潜力为68.57%,核心为解析气资源化利用,路线B、C降碳关键为蒸汽梯级利用与电力清洁化,最大碳减排潜力分别为50.00%、49.61%。路线C为当前最优低碳制氢路线;余热回收、绿电替代与副产气资源化可显著提升各路线低碳竞争力。

       

      Abstract: Clarifying the carbon emission and energy efficiency characteristics of various coke oven gas hydrogen production technologies is of great significance for regional low-carbon hydrogen path planning and the green transformation of coking industry.The life cycle assessment method is adopted to quantitatively evaluate and horizontally compare three mainstream technical routes, namely direct hydrogen production from coke oven gas (Route A), steam catalytic reforming hydrogen production from coke oven gas (Route B), and cryogenic separation co-production hydrogen production from coke oven gas (Route C). Four core indicators including carbon emission, energy consumption, energy efficiency and hydrogen recovery rate are analyzed emphatically, followed by uncertainty and sensitivity analysis to select the optimal process route. The results show that: (1) In terms of carbon emissions, Route C has the lowest carbon emission of 5.09kgCO?/kgH?, Route B has the highest value of 15.46kgCO?/kgH?, and Route A is in the middle with 13.59kgCO?/kgH?; (2) In terms of energy efficiency and hydrogen recovery rate, Route C achieves the highest total energy efficiency of 86.01%, Route B can realize incremental hydrogen output with a hydrogen recovery rate of 161.19%, while Route A ranks the lowest in both indicators; (3) In terms of process optimization, Route A owns the maximum carbon emission reduction potential of 68.57% relying mainly on the resource utilization of stripped gas. The key carbon reduction measures for Route B and Route C are cascade steam utilization and clean power substitution, with maximum carbon reduction potentials of 50.00% and 49.61% respectively. The study reveals that Route C is the optimal low-carbon hydrogen production route at present; waste heat recovery, green electricity substitution and resource utilization of by-product gas can greatly improve the low-carbon competitiveness of all technical routes.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回