高级检索

    1000MW对冲燃煤锅炉掺氨燃烧数值模拟研究

    Numerical study of co-firing ammonia with coal in a 1000 MW opposed boiler

    • 摘要: 燃煤锅炉掺氨燃烧是实现火电行业源头规模化碳减排的有效途径,但氨气燃烧及污染物生成特性与煤差异巨大,如何高效清洁掺烧是当前国内外面临的主要难题。此外,我国煤氨掺烧试验与示范相较国外起步较晚,各研究机构对其研究成果与核心技术处于封锁阶段,至今仍缺乏针对大型燃煤锅炉掺氨燃烧较为系统的运行指导方案。针对上述问题,以某1000MW墙式对冲燃煤锅炉为研究对象,利用Fluent商业软件开展了20%和40%掺氨比例(热量基准)下的燃烧数值模拟,旨在探明最佳的氨气掺烧方式、位置以及燃烧器组合方式。首先,在20%掺氨比例下考察了氨气与一次风混合方式对锅炉燃烧及污染物排放的影响,结果表明将一次风作为燃尽风并采用氨气非预混掺烧方式能够显著提升氨气着火稳定性,同时抑制炉内燃料型NO转化并降低NO排放。其次,对20%掺氨比例下(停运一台磨煤机)的掺氨位置进行数值模拟寻优,结果表明在中间层(B、E)掺烧氨气容易促进C-N交互反应发生,导致NO大量生成,但从上(C)或者下(A、D)层掺氨则可避免在氨气燃烧器出口产生高NO区域,以降低NO排放。再次,对40%掺氨比例下(停运两台磨煤机)的掺氨位置组合方式进行了研究,结果同样表明应尽量避免从中间层(B、E)掺烧氨气,该掺氨比例下最佳的掺氨位置组合为A-C方式。最后,对不同掺氨比例下的排烟参数进行了比较,结果表明掺氨比例的提高将增大炉膛出口的热烟气体积流量及温度,因此受热面的兼容性改造将可能成为未来燃煤锅炉掺氨燃烧需要重点解决的新问题。

       

      Abstract: Cofiring ammonia with coal is an effective approach to realize large-scale carbon reduction for coal power plants, but due to the significant difference in combustion and pollutant formation characteristics between ammonia and coal, how to achieve high-efficiency and clean cofiring ammonia with coal is a major challenge globally. In addition, China's coal and ammonia cofiring test and demonstration started relatively late compared with foreign countries, and the research results and core technology of each research institution are in the stage of blocking, it is still in absence of systematic operation guidance for ammonia cofiring in large coal power plants. To this end, based on a 1000 MW opposed wall coal-firing boiler, simulations have been carried out with 20% and 40% ammonia blending ratios (heat basis) using Fluent commercial software, in order to figure out the optimal ammonia mixing pattern, location and combination configuration. Firstly, the influence of mixing pattern between ammonia and primary air on combustion and pollutant emission is studied under 20% cofiring ratio, and it reveals that the ignition stability of ammonia can be enhanced by making primary air as overfired air and using non-premixed cofiring pattern, moreover, the fuel-NO conversion can be inhibited and the NO emission can be reduced. Subsequently, the ammonia cofiring location is optimized under 20% cofiring ratio (shut down one mill), the result demonstrates that cofiring ammonia in the middle layer (B, E) would facilitate C-N interaction, and lead to substantial NO formation, but cofiring ammonia in upper (C) or lower (A, D) layer can avoid high NO in the burner exit, and consequently to lower the NO emission. Next, the ammonia cofiring location combination is studied under 40% cofiring ratio (shut down two mills). The results indicate likewise that cofiring ammonia via the middle layer (B, E) should be avoided, while the best combination is A-C configuration. Lastly, the exhausted gas parameters are compared for different cofiring ratios, the results indicate that the flue gas volumetric flowrate and temperature will be promoted with the ammonia cofiring ratio, so the compatibility modification of the heating surfaces would become a new question that needs to be solved for ammonia cofiring with coal in boilers in the future.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回